ログイン
Language:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. 学術雑誌論文
  2. A-Z
  3. P-
  1. INDEX:組織別
  2. 農研機構 農業環境研究部門
  3. 学術論文

Mating-disruption or mass-trapping?-Numerical simulation analysis of control strategy for lepidopteran pests

https://repository.naro.go.jp/records/2001692
https://repository.naro.go.jp/records/2001692
14d653a9-5085-44e0-845b-31815957220f
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
postprint_10.1007-s10144-006-0018-0.pdf postprint_10.1007-s10144-006-0018-0.pdf (511 KB)
アイテムタイプ 学術雑誌論文 / Journal Article(1)
公開日 2026-05-29
タイトル
タイトル Mating-disruption or mass-trapping?-Numerical simulation analysis of control strategy for lepidopteran pests
言語 en
言語
言語 eng
キーワード
言語 en
主題Scheme Other
主題 Mating-disruption, Mass-trapping, lepidopteran pest, random mating model, Population model
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ journal article
アクセス権
アクセス権 open access
アクセス権URI http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
著者 山中, 武彦

× 山中, 武彦

en YAMANAKA, Takehiko

ja 山中, 武彦

ja-Kana ヤマナカ, タケヒコ


Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 I constructed a simulation model applicable in both mass-trapping and mating-disruption for lepidopteran pest insects. The basic structure of the model is based on mass-trapping proposed by Knipling and McGuire (1966, Agric. Info. Bull. 308:1-20), but it is modified to include mechanistic competition among females and lures. Several new implications are derived from the model. 1) Long living pests are hard to control; 2) Protandry does not improve the control efficiency for pests with low survival rates; 3) Sexual communication occurring across large distances is more difficult to control than those across a short range; 4) There is an upper limit of improvement according to the increase of pheromone traps; 5) Catching efficiency of the traps does not improve mating suppression though improvements in lure efficiency greatly do. In particular, the last implication has practical importance. If an efficient lure attracts males or inhibits their ability to locate females and mate, then mating-disruption works equal to mass-trapping with the same number of lures. In such a case, mating-disruption is preferred over mass-trapping because the former does not incur the cost of the trapping devices. On the other hand, mass-trapping should be considered over mating disruption if the lure is not efficient enough and no other methods are available.
言語 en
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 First published: 31 October 2006
言語 en
書誌情報 en : Population Ecology

巻 49, 号 1, p. 75-86, 発行日 2007-01
出版者
出版者 Springer
言語 en
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ PISSN
収録物識別子 1438-3896
DOI
関連タイプ isVersionOf
識別子タイプ DOI
関連識別子 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-006-0018-0
言語 en
関連名称 Publisher's version
権利
権利情報 ©The Society of Population Ecology and Springer 2006
言語 en
権利
権利情報 This version of the article has been accepted for publication, after peer review (when applicable) and is subject to Springer Nature’s AM terms of use, but is not the Version of Record and does not reflect post-acceptance improvements, or any corrections. The Version of Record is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10144-006-0018-0
言語 en
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ AM
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2026-05-27 06:44:24.841121
Show All versions

Share

Share
tweet

Cite as

Other

print

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX
  • ZIP

コミュニティ

確認

確認

確認


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3